On my nightly show, I have routinely said that violence does not work. 6 itself, after the violence had unfolded. The opposite is the case: I have condemned political violence hundreds of times on my show Timcast IRL-like I did on Jan.
#Tim pool time magazine full
Raskin played or even the full 30-minute long podcast did I ever encourage anyone to go to D.C., let alone to engage in any kind of violence or protest. In what way is reporting the news the equivalent of "promoting" it? Nowhere in the clip Rep. It also included a video of me simply reading out a news report that the protest was likely to happen, noting that Trump and his supporters viewed it as Trump's last stand, and concurring with the President that it was likely to get wild. It featured three people promoting the protest with gusto. "Meanwhile, other key Trump supporters, including far right media personalities, began promoting the wild protest on January 6."Īs proof that right wing media personalities were "promoting the wild protest," Rep. In response to Trump's tweet that the protest would "be wild," Trump's supporters "responded immediately," Raskin said. 6 with the violent attack that later unfolded. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) tried to connect then-President Donald Trump's tweet calling his supporters to come to a rally in Washington on Jan. I was even more surprised to see myself misrepresented by members of the United States Congress.ĭuring Tuesday's televised hearing, Rep. Be it news or anything else.During this week's January 6 Committee hearings, I was surprised to find myself included in the evidence. But there's going to be small startups and it's going to be a lot easier for the individual to get their brand recognized as soon as they launch. I think the average person isn't going to be too worried about a logo, but I think we're going to see a lot of people who have their own smaller brands-I don't think citizen journalists, because the idea of a citizen journalist sort of a one-off, they report one time. POOL: I'm planning, it's in the roadmap, of doing a quick feature for logo generation. So this removes the question of who is doing this news because now the content itself is branded by the news organization that paid for it to be produced, and the journalist gets credited for doing the work.ĬAPITAL: Do you envision a future where citizen journalists have their own proprietary logos that they are watermarking things with? Quick example: Coming from a journalism space, when someone is reporting news, users follow the journalist and not necessarily the news company, but the news company is paying for the journalist to report. For brands, and for smaller or bigger news companies, you can get brand value across the board from all of your staff. It prevents organizations from using your content without permission. For the consumer, for the average person, you get credit for your work.
POOL: It's a simple idea that solves a lot of problems. Hopefully this changes all that.ĬAPITAL: What to you is the value of a watermark or timestamp in the current media climate? I've seen news organizations outright just take photos from Instagram and use it for news without credit, without permission. There were instances where, I can't name names, but a big show used my content without credit. I want people to be able to get their information from me. For me, it's about getting the word out that you can follow me for more information. I get between 50 and 100 retweets when I'm doing breaking news and I just thought I was losing a lot of value. We need to get to the point where Glass is indispensable.ĬAPITAL: Did Taggly stem from any instances where your own work was used without attribution that particularly frustrated you? Word Lens and Livestream are revolutionary with Glass in my opinion, but we need more. It seems to me what we need right now is the developments. I was really, really excited because I overestimated what it was going to be.
POOL: I think it was the other way around. Livestream.' And then boom you're broadcasting to the world.ĬAPITAL: Were you skeptical when you started using it? Did it meet your expectations?
The other big advantage right now is that Livestream for Glass just came out, so you can actually just say, 'O.K., Glass. You look at a sign in Spanish and what you see in the camera is English.
Now there's an app called Word Lens, which allows me to look at a sign in a foreign language and it translates an image in English in front of me in the viewfinder. The biggest advantage: The translation for Glass was faster than anything I've used. There are a lot of apps that need to be made that I'm hoping will come out soon. What did it do for you and are you continuing to still use it? CAPITAL: You were one of the first reporters to Google Glass on the ground, most notably in your coverage of protests in Istanbul last year.
0 kommentar(er)
